|
Post by skyship on Feb 3, 2014 2:26:14 GMT -5
Dear Friends, Creation of Biological Perfection is self explanatory, however, it includes the Universality of all humans. For instance one avenue of study and possible fulfillment, is the modification of A, B and other Blood types to Universal O Type. Bacterial antigens were used to do this. One human race, one blood type. This is an example. How did this all start? Who is generating this techno eugenics? Why do these masters of the "art of alchemey" or nano, or molecular matter want to destroy diversity in the biological human? Where did this idea originate? What is the EndGame? When did this begin and when will we know if we are authentically "natural" or authentically "RichGEN" Is this selective on our part? These are questions I and my fellow researchers are attempting to answer. We do not have the qualifications of those we are to mention in this paper, but, we can understand their drift toward these two classes of humans: A type of Social Biology in the new Socialist System, or One World Order. To have One World Order, first the chaos has to be present, all the variations of all the diseases, if not inherited, acquired from the environment which in and of itself is also in an adaptive state of re genesis. Lets begin with the "Remaking of Eden". In order to accept this, many of these stolen "best and brightest" children are selected for top positions of such endeavors. They have had their lives stolen from them, and they are tools for these people, many themselves descendents of these creators of biological perfection. The Cremation of Care has to be part of the protocol for these students to become the desired tools for this new Endeavor. Many do not have a choice. And yet the poor, and those desiring to be educated to live better lives, are having the doors of Academia slammed in their faces. Yet, who said a poor child does not have a brain? Or a disabled person, or deaf person, or blind person? Now, we are faced with an operation that will make us all the same. We will be Enhanced or we will be Naturally modified with proteins from nature. Where is the selection process? What in our genes would determine which hive we are in. Either way, we will all be Enhanced in one group, or Naturalists in the other. We with Morgellons are chained to the fence. However, if we remove the chains than we are free to make our own decisions. However, to mandate this into two classes is not Biological Democracy. It is selected for us. So, if we are on the fence, we know why. We can still choose. Do we join the hives or do we step out and enlighten ourselves to the fullness of nature and use it as our companion? That the birds know. They land on fences, they look at the view, they jump down into the fenced area for food orchestrated by what is fenced in or given to them by you, they can jump down on the wild side and search for what suits them, letting nature lead the way, or they can fly away, find another fence. They know where harm is, and they know the risk of freedom, and they know the risk of domestication by you who would control them. In the Cremation of Care, the Night Owl is the mascot. Why is that? Because they operate in darkness. The birds that would communicate with you are available for viewing all day long. Even Black birds, crows, those nasty starlings, those garbage hunting seagulls, all have their jobs to do. Then once in a while you come across a Jonathan Livingston Seagull, who wants to fly as high as he can, yet is enlightened by the height, and reaches new limits every time he flies. We in the controlled natural group will have wings clipped, we will be service to the GenRich, for they will want the perfection, they will want, not out of need, but want perfection. But, it is through our suffering the gifts are found. It is through our caring for those who suffer, and even nature knows this. We underestimate this Nature and all the Natural circles of life, for there are many in the 6 kingdoms. We are not merely 3 Domains. This is a prelude, and General View, a Macro view which will work its way down to the Minimal view and the cause of Morgellons. This is a big venture, because it will show where the Morgellons filaments, cores, particles, exchanged nuclei in cytoskeletel cells, Extracellular Matrix _(ECM) incorporates the loss of natural proteins, for the benefit of immortal proteins that will keep the natural body functioning. Functional proteins will substitute for natural proteins which are leaving the body, just like Dystrophin leaves the body of young boys, who will not be superior athletes, who will not be able to drive the new carbon free cars, or ride those "slick bikes", but they too have minds that are filled with wonderful ideas and many have found ways to express them and they are "brilliant". Physical disability is not mental disability. They are productive, their minds are intact, it is only the muscle that prevents them from moving like you or I. But, they are not precious? Yes, in more ways than one, they are superior in that 6th sense given to those who suffer. If one is perfect, suffering is never present, or even seeing it is never in that world. So, we get the idea. This first post is to present a general thought that we are all created equal under God, and yet these creators do not believe in anyone greater than themselves. It is sad they have not been privy to the Greatest Cause, mentioned a few times by Erasmus Darwin, and Charles Darwin never claimed we came from apes. He knew that intermediates were necessary to cause Evolution. This has been so twisted from the very beginning. No one really understood Darwin at all, and yet he realized as did Einstein as well, that there is something greater and that we who suffer know this and we know that we are on the fence for a reason. It takes life changing events for us to really wake up, see the illusion cast, take the mask off and be honest and real. So, the idea behind the whole Evolutionary Idea, is to eliminate the undesirable, whether by lack of adaptation or by lack of care. So, at the end we may be able to utilize those protocols we know will heal where we are losing our proteins, our mitochondrial nuclei our unfolded native proteins that keep us natural. But, this is where the call may have to reach outside this earth, for a higher enlightenment that reminds us where we came from, and the Smithsonian can open its doors to the masses who will be amazed. For this hidden knowledge is what will tell the story. We must persist. We are Americans and it is the Americans who will be most challenged, others in other countries either are dead, or are refugees, or are forced to migrate either because of weather modification or because of war, genocide or extinction due to "failure to adapt". So, the next post will put a general/macro universal look at how this was set in motion, what the thinking is, what the middle domain consists of, and finally what the building blocks are to revamp the human race. For starters: Skizit has posted a video and Sophie Smallstorm has explained some of this. This will give you the general picture, and where Morgellons is involved, for these are "Foreign Adaptive Proteins" and the particles in the protein and the hydrogen bonds which connect the natural parts in correct manner. These hydrogen bonds are being broken, to bring in the other amino acids, detrimental to the natural performance of the human body. We will be natural to serve those who are perfect, but we will be Supermolecular, we will have to use steroids, which many of us have suffered through. These steroids are not kind to blood cells and other normal cells. Many will not be able to adapt. We are the "canaries in the coal mine" as Jan Smith has said. We are the prototypes. If we can gather the energies of the earth and use it with the energies from space, and they are there, we can overcome this. Many are not aware of the fruits/leaves that heal, the roots that heal, the herbal book of life, the powers of just "lifting the veil". For we have that 6th sense. And most with Morgellons know it. Skizits videos and talk of Universal Life as Well: www.youtube.com/playlist?list=UUtHPfNRr7LbfkMiTRl8g_tAwww.skizit.biz/category/synthetic-biology-2/Sophie Smallstorm: Parts I and II www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSQ-dp1sV5wIf you have seen these, you get the general view. But, we will look at another view, that is often overlooked, but, is very important. Skyship
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 3, 2014 2:50:05 GMT -5
First, what is this Macro view all about? This may open your eyes as to how these new creators think. Remaking Eden —Lee M. Silver,Remaking Eden tinyurl.com/moma6dbtinyurl.com/kqklpfdNow this began after Eugeneics was supposedly stopped in 1930: However Cold Spring Harbor began their symposiums in 1933. Here are some unfound papers describing work in 1950.
Human Diversity and Adaptation:HUMAN DIVERSITY AND ADAPTATION Theodosius Dobzhansky + Author Affiliations Columbia University, New York This extract was created in the absence of an abstract. Excerpt The principle that all men are created equal before the Law is the foundation of modem democracy. This principle was deduced, in the Age of Reason, from the Christian maxim that all men are equal before God. The simplicity of this idea of equality does not, however, satisfy everybody. Some overzealous partisans of democracy contend that men are not only equal but also biologically alike. Not a great deal of biological education is needed to see the fatuity of this contention, which is in addition mischievous because it opens the door to its own antithesis, namely the assertion that the incontestable evidence of biological diversity of men destroys the basis of democracy. For the purpose of democracy is precisely to enable diverse, although fundamentally kindred, persons to live together and to participate in common civilization. Democracy would be superfluous in a world of standardized mediocrity, and it becomes impossible when... symposium.cshlp.org/content/15/385.short
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 3, 2014 3:19:09 GMT -5
Many things were happening in 1933. The first paper by this Symposia, 70 years old. Surface Phenomena Please click on titles and find those topics. In the 1933 paper, note the topics: Surface Phenomena: Volume I 1933: Surface Phenomena, Vol. I symposium.cshlp.org/site/misc/topic1.xhtmlTable of Contents: lists conductance. nerves, electrical behavior in plants, human etc.... symposium.cshlp.org/content/1============================== 1934: symposium.cshlp.org/site/misc/topic2.xhtml========================= Internal secretions, androgens, hormones etc: symposium.cshlp.org/content/5symposium.cshlp.org/site/misc/topic5.xhtml============== Now you may say so what? But remember some papers were from the early 1900s. So, by going back you can see where this went. The progress is there. the Aim was already there. ========================= 1938: Protein Chemistry, Vol. VI Organizer: Eric Ponder Proteins are now so well understood and so much a part of our knowledge that it is almost impossible to put ourselves in the position of the participants in the 1938 Symposium. For example, in that year, Linderstrom-Lang, Hotchkiss and Lang had written in Nature that their data on protein denaturation "..provide sufficient basis for giving a warning against the conclusion that genuine proteins contain peptide bonds..." And, as late as the 1949 Symposium, Fred Sanger could write that his results with insulin "...suggest that each position in a protein chain is occupied by a single unique amino acid residue...it does suggest that proteins are real chemical entities with a unique structure...". The 1938 Symposium was attended by many of the most (or soon to be) eminent protein chemists of the day—Max Bergmann, Edwin Cohn, John Edsall, Joseph Fruton, Hans Neurath, Carl Niemann, Dorothy Wrinch, and Ralph Wyckoff—and it provides an illuminating snapshot of the uncertainties and confusion that surrounded the nature of proteins. Niemann, for example, discussed a theory of protein structure developed by himself and Bergmann. They believed that the total number of amino acids in a protein could be expressed in the from 2n x 3m, and that each amino acid occurred at the same interval along the polypeptide chain—A.B.C.A.B.C.A.B.C etc. A numerological approach was also the foundation of Wrinch's cyclol or fabric theory of protein structure. On the other hand, Fruton presented experimental data showing that proteinases were able to cleave the peptide bond in synthetic peptides, suggesting that that was their mode of action on native proteins. Wendell Stanley (who was to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1946) had crystallized Tobacco Mosaic Virus only three years earlier and he discussed, among other topics, his attempts to produce an infectious viral protein. symposium.cshlp.org/site/misc/topic6.xhtml=========================== 1946 Heredity and Variations symposium.cshlp.org/site/misc/topic11.xhtml============================= molecular genetics, where we are today.
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 3, 2014 3:44:17 GMT -5
I am unable to locate the info by chairman: Origin and Evolution of Man. But, this is available.=============================== symposium.cshlp.org/site/misc/topic16.xhtmlsymposium.cshlp.org/content/16===================================== Now, the evolutionary aspects of genetics: theoretical science
================================= Most of this was taking place at Cold Spring Harbor. You can see just by looking here at the titles, click on those of interest and you will expand your knowledge of how this progressed over the years: 1933-2003 symposium.cshlp.org/site/misc/index_archive.xhtml 2004-2012:
symposium.cshlp.org/content/by/year
Advanced Online Articles: symposium.cshlp.org/content/early/recent ==========================
But, important here is the study on nucleic in the cells: going back to 1947: Directed Mutation.=========================== The volume opens with a tribute to John Masson Gulland, the English nucleic acid chemist who had been killed in a train crash on 26 October, just four months after he had participated in the Symposium. (Manchester, K. Did a tragic accident delay the discovery of the double helical structure of DNA? Trends Biochem. Sci. 20: 126-128, 1995). The work discussed in this paper—Gulland's evidence from electrometric titrations of DNA that the bases were joined by hydrogen bonds—played an important part in substantiating the double helix. As Watson put it, "...a rereading of J. M. Gulland's and D. O. Jordan's papers...made me finally realize the strength of their conclusion that a large fraction, if not all, of the bases formed hydrogen bonds to other bases."— Jan A. Witkowski symposium.cshlp.org/site/misc/topic12.xhtml========================== If you want to know the games, the thefts, and the other things that happened involving the DNA structure, which was actually deciphered by Rosalind Franklin, then you can see that Acadmeia have fights of their own and competition for discovery was often deadly and still is.
Please watch this video of the real truth behind the DNA structure and who was involved, and who was kind hearted. It appears that a few respected this great lady. Things may have been different if she had lived beyond 37 years old.=========================== Secrets Of Photo 51: www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tmNf6ec2kU#t=3259=============================
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 3, 2014 4:52:38 GMT -5
Here is a view of the double helix -- the subject of Rosalind Franklin's Photo 51. With the help of her photograph, James Watson and Francis Crick were able to piece together the first accurate model of DNA. Shown here is the structure of naked DNA -- DNA without all of the proteins that organize it into chromatin. Note how its structure resembles a twisted ladder. Note also that DNA with a "left-handed" twist, as this has, is a special kind of DNA known as Z-DNA. DNA bases The DNA molecule is made up of four bases -- adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T). Each rung of the DNA ladder consists of two bases. In the DNA molecule, A always pairs up with T, and C always pairs up with G. One nucleotide The sides of the DNA ladder consist of a long string of sugar and phosphate molecules, to which the bases are attached. Each sugar-phosphate-base combination is called a nucleotide. Molecular structure A nucleotide is made up of 30 atoms, plus or minus a few, depending on the base. It's no wonder that determining the sequence of bases in the human genome -- all three billion of them -- was such a monumental accomplishment. And though the task of determining the sequence is over, that of understanding the sequence is just beginning. Figuring out how these three billion bases code for a human being will keep researchers busy for many decades to come. www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/genome/dna_sans.html===================================== Regenesis by George M. Church: Book "How Synthetic Biology will reinvent Nature and Ourselves" From the Prologue "The idea of improving the human species has always had an enormously bad press, stemming largely from the errors and excesses associated with the eugenics movements of the past. Historically, eugenics has covered everything from selective breeding for the purpose of upgrading the human gene pool to massive human rights violations against classes of people regarded as undesirable, degenerate, or unfit because of traits such as religion, sexual preference, handicap, and so on, culminating, in the extreme case, in the Nazi extermination program. Some proposals for enhancing the human body have had a harebrained ring to them, as for example the idea of equipping people with gills so that they could live in the sea alongside sharks. Burdened with past evils and silliness, any new proposal for changing human beings through genomic engineering faces an uphill battle. But consider this modest proposal: What if it were possible to make human beings immune to all viruses, known or unknown, natural or artificial? No more viral epidemics, influenza pandemics, or AIDS infections. Viruses do their damage by entering the cells of the host organism and then using the cellular machinery to replicate themselves, often killing the host cells in the process. This leads to the release of new viruses that proceed to infect other cells, which in turn produce yet more virus particles, and so on. Viruses can take control of a cell’s genetic machinery because both the virus and the cell share the same genetic code. However, changing the genetic code of the host cell, as well as that of the cellular machinery that reads and expresses the viral genome, could thwart the virus’s ability to infect cells (see Chapter 5). All this may sound wildly ambitious, but there is little doubt that the technology of genome engineering is in principle up to the task. An additional benefit of engineering a sweeping multivirus resistance into the body is that it would alleviate a common fear concerning synthetic biology— the accidental creation of an artificial supervirus to which humans would have no natural immunity."....... ......"While it is clear that embryos develop primitive characteristics that are subsequently lost in adults, Haeckel’s so-called biogenetic law is an overstatement and was not universally true when first proposed or today. However, I hereby propose a biogenetic law of my own, one that describes the current situation in molecular engineering and biotechnology: “Engineering recapitulates evolution.” Through human ingenuity, and by using the knowledge of physics and chemistry gained over the course of six industrial revolutions, we have developed the ability to manipulate and engineer matter, and by doing so we have rediscovered and harnessed the results of six similar revolutions that occurred during billions of years of biological evolution. Using nanobiotechnology, we stand at the door of manipulating genomes in a way that reflects the progress of evolutionary history: starting with the simplest organisms and ending, most portentously, by being able to alter our own genetic makeup. Synthetic genomics has the potential to recapitulate the course of natural genomic evolution, with the difference that the course of synthetic genomics will be under our own conscious deliberation and control instead of being directed by the blind and opportunistic processes of natural selection. We are already remaking ourselves and our world, retracing the steps of the original synthesis—redesigning, recoding, and reinventing nature itself in the process."....... www.regenesisthebook.com/?p=4
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 3, 2014 4:58:58 GMT -5
We are still looking at the overall view here: The Threshold Challenge of the New Human Genetic TechnologiesMarch 1st, 2003Introduction We are fast approaching arguably the most consequential technological threshold in all of human history: the ability to alter the genes we pass to our children.Crossing this threshold would irrevocably change the nature of human life and human society. It would destabilize human biology. It would put into play wholly unprecedented social, psychological and political forces that would feed back upon themselves with impacts quite beyond our ability to foresee, much less control.
Advocates of this new techno-eugenics look forward to the day when parents quite literally assemble their children from genes listed in a catalogue. They celebrate a future in which our common humanity is lost as genetically enhanced elites increasingly acquire the attributes of separate species.
The implications for individual integrity and autonomy, for family and community life, for social and economic justice and indeed for world peace are chilling. Once humans begin cloning and genetically engineering their children for desired traits we will have crossed a threshold of no return. The world community is only just beginning to understand the full implications of the new human genetic technologies. There are few civil society institutions, and there is no social or political movement, critically addressing the immense challenges these technologies pose. We need to move with all deliberate speed to bring the new human genetic technologies within the ambit of responsible societal governance. National and international leaders and civil society constituencies need to inform themselves about critical aspects of the new human genetic technologies and join together to build nothing less than a new civilizational commitment to fully engage this threshold challenge. The Basic ScienceMany applications of human genetic technology are benign and hold great potential for preventing disease and alleviating suffering. Other applications open the door to a human future more horrific than our worst nightmares. We need to distinguish between these, and support the former and oppose the latter. The two technologies of most concern are human cloning and inheritable genetic modification.Cloning is the creation of a genetic duplicate of an existing organism. Human cloning starts by creating a human embryo that carries the same set of genes as an existing person. If this embryo is used for research purposes—say, for generating some types of stem cells—the process is called research cloning. If instead the embryo is implanted in a woman's uterus and brought to term to produce a child, the process is called reproductive cloning. Genetic modification means changing the genes in a living cell. T here are two types of genetic modification: non-inheritable genetic modification and inheritable genetic modification. Non-inheritable genetic modification changes the genes in cells other than egg or sperm cells. If a lung disease is caused by defective lung cell genes, it might be possible to treat the disease by modifying the genes in those lung cells. Such changes are not passed to future children. Applications of this sort are currently in clinical trials, and are generally considered to be socially acceptable.Inheritable genetic modification (IGM) changes genes in eggs, sperm, or very early embryos. These changes not only affect the child immediately born but are passed down to that child's descendants as well, in perpetuity. This application is by far the more consequential, for it opens the door to the reconfiguration of the human species. (The technical terms for non-inheritable and inheritable genetic modification are somatic and germline genetic modification, respectively.) Many people assume that inheritable genetic modification is needed to allow couples to avoid passing on genetic diseases such as Tay Sachs or sickle cell anemia. This is not so. More acceptable and straightforward means already exist to accomplish this same goal, in all but a very few cases. In the technique known as pre-implantation screening, couples at risk of passing on a gene-related disease use in-vitro fertilization to conceive several zygotes, after which those found to be free of the harmful gene are implanted and brought to term. No modification of genes is required. Options such as adoption and egg, sperm and embryo donation are also available. Inheritable genetic modification is necessary only if a couple wish to "enhance" a child with genes neither of them carry. A New IdeologyAdvocacy of cloning, inheritable genetic modification and the new eugenics is an integral element of a newly emerging socio-political ideology. This ideology differs from conservative ideologies in its antipathy towards religion and traditional social values, from left-progressive ideologies in its rejection of egalitarian values and social welfare as a public purpose, and from Green ideologies in its enthusiastic advocacy of a technologically reconfigured and transformed natural world. It embraces commitments to science and technology as autonomous endeavors properly exempt from social control, to the priority of market outcomes, and to a political philosophy grounded in social Darwinist views of human nature and society.This ideology is gaining acceptance among scientific, high-tech, media and policy elites. A key foundational text is Remaking Eden: Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World by molecular biologist Lee Silver of Princeton University. Silver looks forward to a future in which the health, appearance, personality, cognitive ability, sensory capacity and life span of our children all become artifacts of genetic modification. Silver acknowledges that the costs of these technologies will limit their widespread adoption, so that over time society will segregate into the "GenRich" and the "Naturals." In Silver's vision of the future: Silver continues: Silver is hardly alone. Here's James Watson, co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, Nobel laureate and founding director of the Human Genome Project:
And here's Dr. Gregory Pence, professor of philosophy in the Schools of Medicine and Arts/Humanities at the University of Alabama: Or consider this excerpt from an interview with University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Arthur Caplan: Here's noted economist Lester Thurow of MIT: Can it get worse than this? Yes. In Germany recently an uproar ensued following statements by philosopher Peter Sloterdijk that the failure of social democracy now leaves human genetic engineering (which he referred to as "Selektion," a word associated with Nazi genocide) as the only means for humanity to improve its lot. In the last few years advocates of the new techno-eugenics have become increasingly vocal and confident. They are taking lead roles in organizing major conferences, establishing policy institutes and membership-based advocacy groups, sitting on government panels and corporate ethical advisory boards, publishing a steady stream of serious books and articles, and more. These are the sorts of activities that mark the emergence of a new ideological and political movement. www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=272this was 2003.........It has become political..........
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 3, 2014 5:24:27 GMT -5
year 2000: GE - Techno-Eugenics Newsletter "We should be on our guard not to overestimate science and scientific methods when it is a question of human problems; and we should not assume that experts are the only ones who have a right to express themselves on questions affecting the organization of society." -- Albert Einstein (Time Magazine's "Person of the Century"), May 1949. II. UPCOMING EVENTS 1. The Asilomar 25th anniversary symposium, the "Symposium on Science, Ethics and Society," will be held February 15-17 in Pacific Grove, CA. According to the program, "The presence at the symposium of a number of those who led and participated in the 1975 Asilomar conference will help to ground the discussion in a rich substrate of reality, even as the involvement of historians and other social scientists, lawyers, and philosophers will bring outsiders' perspectives. Furthermore, the active participation of present and past government officials, regulators, and critics of the scientific enterprise should supply an element that was largely absent twenty-five years ago." The symposium is being organized by Professor Alexander Capron of the Pacific Center for Health Policy and Ethics, University of Southern California Law School, <acapron@law.usc.edu>. www.gene.ch/info4action/2000/Feb/msg00018.html================== Asimilar Conference: 1975 Background: recombinant DNA technology Recombinant DNA technology arose as a result of advances in biology that began in the 1950s and 60’s. During these decades, a tradition of merging the structural, biochemical and informational approaches to the central problems of classical genetics became more apparent. Two main underlying concepts of this tradition were that genes consisted of DNA and that DNA encoded information that determined the processes of replication and protein synthesis. These concepts were embodied in the model of DNA proposed by James Watson and Francis Crick, and further research on the Watson-Crick model yielded theoretical advances that were reflected in new capacities to manipulate DNA.[5] One of these capacities was recombinant DNA technology. Experimental design This technology entails the joining of DNA from different species and the subsequent insertion of the hybrid DNA into a host cell. One of the first individuals to develop recombinant DNA technology was a biochemist at Stanford by the name of Paul Berg.[6] In his experimental design in 1974, he cleaved (cut into fragments) the monkey virus SV40. He then cleaved the double helix of another virus; an antibacterial agent known as bacteriophage lambda. In the third step, he fastened DNA from the SV40 to DNA from the bacteriophage lambda. The final step involved placing the mutant genetic material into a laboratory strain of the E. coli bacterium. This last step, however, was not completed in the original experiment.[7] Initial bio-safety concerns Berg did not complete his final step due to the pleas of several fellow investigators who feared the biohazards associated with the last step. The SV40 was known to cause cancer tumors to develop in mice. Additionally, the E. coli bacterium (although not the strain used by Berg) inhabited the human intestinal tract. For these reasons, the other investigators feared that the final step would create cloned SV40 DNA that might escape into the environment and infect laboratory workers. These workers could then become cancer victims.[7] Concern about this potential biohazard, along with others, caused a group of leading researchers to send a letter to the president of the National Academy of Science (NAS). In this letter, they requested that he appoint an ad hoc committee to study the bio-safety ramifications of this new technology. This committee, called the Committee on Recombinant DNA molecules of the National Academy of Science, U.S.A., held in 1974, concluded that an international conference was necessary to resolve the issue and that until that time, scientists should halt experiments involving recombinant DNA technology.[8] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asilomar_conference_on_recombinant_DNA================== In about five hundred 'gene therapy' clinical trials since the early 1990s, doctors have tried to introduce genetic modifications to patientsí lungs, nerves, muscles, and other tissues. These efforts have been largely unsuccessful. In late 1999, their safety was also called starkly into question by the death of an 18-year-old enrolled in a clinical trial, and by ensuing revelations of almost 700 other 'serious adverse effects' that researchers and doctors had somehow failed to report to the proper regulatory authorities. Some observers have commented that gene therapy would more accurately be called "genetic experiments on human subjects." Many people are reluctant to oppose human germline engineering because they believe that 'genetics' will deliver medical cures or treatments. But there is no reason that we cannot forgo germline engineering and still support other genetic technologies that do in fact hold promising medical potential. In fact, the medical justifications for human germline engineering are strained, while its ethical and political risks are profound. Fortunately, the distinction between human germline engineering and other genetic technologies (including somatic genetic engineering) is a reasonably clear technical demarcation. In many countries, this demarcation is being drawn as law. Legislation that would ban human germline engineering and reproductive cloning is making its way through the Canadian parliament. Germany's Embryo Protection Act of 1990 makes human cloning and germline engineering criminal acts, and the Japanese legislature is considering establishing prison terms for human cloning. A number of other European countries forbid cloning and germline engineering indirectly by outlawing non-therapeutic research on human embryos. Twenty-two European countries have signed a Council of Europe bioethics convention that includes similar restrictions. In the United States, however, neither federal law nor policy forbids human germline engineering or cloning, though federal funds cannot be used for any kinds of human cloning experiments. In order to bring the new human genetic technologies under social governance, strong political pressure and a broad social movement will be necessary. Though no such movement currently exists, efforts to alert and engage a variety of constituencies are getting underway. The movement that this work aims to catalyze will need to draw in a wide range of constituencies, and encompass a variety of motivations. Some participants will base their opposition to a techno-eugenic future on their commitments to equality and justice, and to human improvement through social change rather than technical fix. Others will be moved by the threats to human dignity and human rights, and the horror of treating children as custom-made commodities, that germline engineering and cloning entail. Still others will find their primary inspiration in the precautionary principle, or their wariness of techno-scientific hubris and a reductionist world view, or their objections to corporate ownership of life at the molecular level, or their skepticism about the drastic technological manipulation of the natural world. It will be far easier to prevent a techno-eugenic future if we act before human germline manipulation develops further, either as technology or ideology. This is a crucial juncture: a window that the campaign for human germline engineering is trying to slam shut. Your participation is urgently needed. ngin.tripod.com/technoeugenic.htm================= TRANSHUMANISM: Techno-eugenics for the neo-feudal age “Ye shall be as God”, or so the story goes. «We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.» Dr José Delgado, Yale University Medical School Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118 February 24, 1974 «What is called for here is not genocide, the killing off of the population of incompetent cultures. But we do need to think realistically in terms of the ‘phasing out’ of such peoples. Evolutionary progress means the extinction of the less competent. Survival of the fittest, extinction of the unfit. This is the way to a better world.» Prof. Richard Lynn (2004), “A Review of ‘A New Morality from Science: Beyondism’”, Irish Journal of Psychology, 2. —————————————-——— Transhumanism was founded in the 1950s by top eugenicist Julian Huxley and the Rockefeller Foundation, as a new brand name for the pseudoscience of Eugenics. Its obsession for culling off the ‘genetically inferior’, while at the same time striving to promote dominance for the ‘superior’ had given Eugenics a bad name, particularly after the Nazi brand of Eugenics created the Holocaust, during WWII. Sadly, what most people didn’t know at that time was that Nazi eugenics was merely the full-blown application of the principles that had been developed and were openly espoused by the British, French and American Eugenics Societies. So, Eugenics lived on, under many, heavily funded formats, one of them being Transhumanism. By and large, Transhumanism proposes to use applied science in the fields of genetics, robotics and others, to ‘steer human evolution into the future’. A Transhumanist society will have, as its name implies, ‘transcended humanity’. In such a society, human beings will have been replaced with hyper-efficient worker chimeras, bio-robotic warriors, and other purpose-made humanoid life forms. These stated goals must be tied in with the bigger picture into which Eugenics and Transhumanism fit into. These fields have never been limited to ‘science’ per se — they’ve always been primarily political and economical, and they reflect a very particular view of the world. theposthumanities.brentley.com/2013/05/03/transhumanism-techno-eugenics-for-the-neo-feudal-age/
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 3, 2014 5:52:50 GMT -5
Next, we come to the middle of our discussion: How are these genetic manipulations and modifications being done? How far does this go? Evolution is now in the hands of these manipulators. More info and article: Somthing to think about: Manipulating evolution from now on. How deep does this story go? By Jon Rappoport jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/manipulating-evolution-from-now-on/
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 4, 2014 18:01:28 GMT -5
What do I mean by Creation of Biological Perfection? With evidence and if one is an observer, you see the changes in certain people. Many of us may not see it, but, we see people, who often seem to have changed. Their eyes look different, more rounded, their skin is smooth and often waxy looking. You do not see the wrinkles, you do not see any imperfections, their teeth are pearly white, many who didn't have hair, now have hair, many have white hair, unless they dye it. This is evidence of those who have integrated this new technology, genoming etc. Just look at some celebrities, people in Congress, people on the weather channels, people in news broadcasts. The other thing is showing up in Clinics, and doctors do not know what to do, or refuse to treat unknown syndromes, because they either cannot see the symptoms of genetic engineering, modification or alterations, or, they may know they are artefacts of this new techno epigenetics and are choosing to not treat or are sending Morgies and others with unexplained illnesses to the Psychiatrist who promply supplies medication for the delusion. However, we know this is not a delusion, maybe an illusion on the medical association's part that immortality is only for the few, but not a delusion for those effected. So, when the veil is lifted and we see this inequality of medical health, then we start to see that the veil is becoming torn. For many have found the real science used to stay on top of things, that hidden science that heals etc has been kept from us, only the select can afford it, or use it. What is eugenics? It is the study/implementation of correcting genetic mistakes, and substituting other genetic products that will improve genomes. It is variated, so some do not integrate the new products, some do, depending on DNA makeup of the individual. Many are being forced to be universal. However, in so doing if this is mandated in all medical associations, institutions and across the government, then this is no longer biological democracy, or even democracy at all. For we do not have a choice, that is an individual freedom. Eugenics/Epigenetics/Techno Eugenics is being fullfilled, by using geoengineering, forced weather, or lack of so the environment is changed for those who are Naturals. Either they are emigrated to other countries where this selective weather pattern is not forced to alter the weather, heat or cold or to alter the food, thereby the people in those areas are forced to adapt, move or die. That is Evolutionary genetics, population genetics etc. So, Naturals will have to face Evolutionary Events and use one of those 3 solutions, if you cannot integrate the materials as they are updated. The Natural Hive is those who know how to stay healthy, and can adapt to the environmental changes, or survival of the fittest in this ever changing environment, which is being altered along the way. However, with enhancements this does not effect those who are protected and can upgrade at will. Artefacts are those items left on the Lab floor. The masses are to believe we came from apes, that we evolved from primordial ooze and even set out to experiment in that manner. However, they could not find the intermediates, so they made them and released them in the wild, in foods, etc. So, next we can look at the epitope that is hidden in amyloid caused from unfolding and folding of proteins. Some scientists believe that amyloid is functional, and should be integrated into the genome. However, those who do not break up the prion and the amyloid, will suffer from those non integrated proteins that aggregate and cause bundles or break up and with its prion starts a new filament. We are now finding broken pieces of colored filaments. So, this is part of the breakup of the amyloid. Epitope: The confroming are those that integrate, and there is info on them. They conform just like good little agents. Skyship
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 7, 2014 21:46:21 GMT -5
I am still looking at the beginning of these genetic horrors and why it is going on. It still applies today. Social biology or social evolution. Universal one ness for those who integrate. Experimental Evolution library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/heredity.htmlibrary.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/heredity.htmlibrary.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/heredity.htmlibrary.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/defects.htmlibrary.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/defects.htmOrigins of Eugenics Sir Francis Galton, Darwin’s half-cousin, applied statistical methods and family genealogy to understand and develop ways of improving societies, classes, and individuals. Galton coined the word “eugenics” to define the concept of human improvement through biology. These concepts influenced such fields as philanthropy, sociology, and criminology; hereditarian concepts of criminality and its control were systematized by Italian psychiatrist Cesare Lombroso. Physiognomy and phrenology, the idea that human biological and social worth can be deduced from physical appearance has roots in the Renaissance and the early modern period. In the mid-nineteenth century, following the articulation of natural selection and evolution of organisms by Charles Darwin, many natural philosophers and scientists saw understanding and manipulation of the mechanism of inheritance as key to better humans, races, and societies.library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/origins.htm===================== When the Creamation of Care ritual is finally recognized, as in Bohemian Grove. Creamation of Care. In this case Darwin did state this but not in Origin of Species but in Descent of Man: library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/darwin.htm============================ How do you look at that word Care? ================================ Directed Human Heredity: library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/galton.htm========================== Karl Pearson: library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/pearson.htm================ library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/lombroso.htm================== library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/mizzou.htm====================== much more finally open to public, so we get a good idea of this Experimental Evolution. Skyship
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 7, 2014 22:05:05 GMT -5
The American Breeders Association, founded in 1903, was the first scientific organization in the U.S. to recognize the importance of Mendel’s Laws and to support eugenic research. At the first annual meeting in St Louis, University of Missouri Professor of Agriculture Fredrick B. Mumford became one of the Association’s first officers. library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/breeders.htmDuring the 1912-1913 school year, thirty-two universities and colleges throughout the United States were offered an honorarium to provide a lecture on the subject of eugenics. Sponsored by Lucy James Wilson, wife of former Assistant Secretary of State Huntington Wilson, the lecture series aimed at “paving the way to an effective operation of public opinion and wise legislation along eugenical lines” by putting the subject “clearly and forcefully before as many undergraduate student bodies as possible.” The lecture presented by Professor Charles A. Ellwood at the University of Missouri was selected as one of twelve in this compilation. Ellwood presented a non-technical discourse on both the values and limitations of eugenics. His lecture emphasized “positive eugenics,” explaining the importance of marriage as a controlling factor in the quality of future generations and arguing for the importance of selecting wisely from a biological standpoint. Conversely, Ellwood explained the futility of adopting unenforceable “negative eugenics” laws to control segments of the population. He also addressed the conflicting views of heredity or environment as most important in determining character, acknowledging the vital contributions of each. The Department of Sociology was founded at MU by Ellwood in 1900. He served as its chair and as advisor to some notable future leaders of the emerging field. Ellwood left the University of Missouri in 1930 to organize and head the Department of Sociology at Duke University. Also on display are Professor Charles Ellwood’s recommendations for reading about eugenics, posted in the University Missourian, April 13th, 1913. library.missouri.edu/exhibits/eugenics/ellwood.htm
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 8, 2014 1:41:46 GMT -5
Some definitions and Understanding Evolution, may be the opposite of what you think. It is happening NOW~! And if you do not see it, you are blind~! But what is causing this Evolution? What is causing new phenotypes, hence genotypes? Why are some not effect by this CHANGE? Why is it being done so fast? What is the excuse for using geoengineering? To cause Evolutionary Events, and quickly by using weather modification as forced evolution. One moves, adapts or dies off. evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/090501_climatechange==================================== Now, if man is changing the environment through aerosol operations, climate change, climate forcing for the wrong reasons, then an evolutionary event is going on and is progressive achieving the very thing of "intentional forced/directed evolution" This is not Evolution~! This is intellegently creating evolution for these changes to take place, so that everyone is effected. This is not Evolution, it is Developed Evolution. or Evo Devo~! It is Evolutionary Biology. It is Evolutionary Population Genetics. They do not have to dump a pandemic on us, they are making it happen, by altering the weather, because they can. They are good at convincing the public.
The problem is created, intentionally pollute, blame it on people, people modify their behavior, but, that is not enough, not enough have left the planet, so you then create a Global Warming Scare and brainwash everyone to believe it. The same people believe that Evolution created us, yet have no proof. Yet evolution takes place because beaks have changed, or the polar bear's coat is now yellow. Ice cracked, but it appears to have cracked from underneath, not above. Why take under the crust minerals and metals and put them on top of the earth? Only heating it more. Where is the Sun in all of this? Still doing its thing.
Meanwhile phenotype variations are recorded, and then genetic modifications show the alterations. Mutations are forced from chemical/biological/geological/atmospheric change including loss of CO2 which helps plants to grow. They are dying. Why dump this in the ocean? Thereby creating more hydrovent, more volcanic actions when the earth is burping. Thereby forcing the crust up, because the heat is below, not above us. It is like opening the Hell Portals. And that may be what was done. So, we are devolving, going back to surface products at the beginning of this so-called Evolution, but we are evolving because we are now inserting polymers and nano which are inorganic, so even though our bodies are the carriers of this inorganic, we are still natural, but what is inside creeping out is not. So, does natural selection also kick out un natural selection? Like zinc fingers, polymers, polyethylene glycol (PEGS), foldomers, oligomers, un natural amino acids, even though the energy was captured from broken hydrogen bonds? And we are left with protein bundles that refused to conform? Solution~!Drugs will now tackle the variations, claim new diseases, syndromes and more dollars spent on substituting genes in drugs, you would never know. Or foods, since they are not labeled. Vaccines, you have no idea of the ingredients. Nucleation exchange in the environment. Horizontal transfer along with Vertical transfer (hereditary) of transmuted genes, so either you are the fittest or the unfit, depending on your carrier status. Now, if your dna over rides this attempt at modification or tranmutation, then you can keep your DNA, otherwise, it is altered, modified or deleted, just reads over the STOP codon. You lose your proteins. So, many diseases are just that. If the unfolded proteins become the bundles, then along comes heat shock proteins, sup35 and 45 to break up the bundles, thereby creating more filaments and prions. Then claim that this is coming from nature, so mass kill herds of deer, because one was found to have prions. And, leave the deer where they lie, prions propagating and then land is off limits to humans. Meanwhile, humans already have the "wasting disease", like muscular dystrophy, where prions did the job has non functional apparatuses. From Functional Amyloids, created in the lab. This did not come from nature, this came from the lab, released onto nature.Skyship
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 8, 2014 3:01:30 GMT -5
Nonsense mutations, or antisense or non coding mutations? Making Muscle Wasting History That wrongly incorporated amino acid is UAA......The unnatural Amino Acid. How long has this been going on? Looks like the duchenners caught them in the act. These are just two , but there are about 12 of them. Sorta like the variations mentioned above?www.actionduchenne.org/duchennepedia/article/203/rtc-13-and-rtc14Unfolding proteins and folding in UAA... the un natural amino acid. but first de naturation has to take place, breaking the hydrogen bonds.
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 8, 2014 3:36:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 8, 2014 3:48:43 GMT -5
We are just getting started...... Evolution happens because of mutations, intentional or accidentally on purpose to create the Illusion that Evolution is Real. What is a Point Mutation?written by: Robyn Broyles•edited by: Paul Arnold•updated: 9/23/2009 A point mutation is the simplest kind of genetic mutation. See the dramatic effects that can arise from such a small substitution in the genome. Simple Substitution A genetic mutation is any change in the DNA code (genome) of a cell. Of all the ways the genome can be changed, the simplest type of mutation is the point mutation. In a point mutation, a single base is substituted for another, changing the meaning of a single codon, leaving the rest of the gene unchanged. Geneticists recognize four types of point mutations, based on the effect on the genome. Synonymous Mutations (Silent Mutations) With 61 codons for 20 amino acids, many of the codons are "synonyms," coding for the same amino acid. Each amino acid can be indicated by up to six different codons (in the case of leucine); only two (methionine and tryptophan) have only one codon. In most cases, the synonyms differ by only one base, so it is possible for a point mutation to result in a codon for the same amino acid. For example, the DNA codons CAA, CAG, CAT, and CAC all code for the amino acid valine. If a strand of DNA undergoes a point mutation in the codon CAA that changes it to CAG, it would still code for valine. This type of substitution is called a synonymous or sense mutation; it is also known as a silent mutation because there is no change in the amino acid sequence. (Find out how "silent" mutations can still have an effect on the gene and its resulting protein.) Missense Mutations A missense mutation is a point mutation that causes a codon to code for a different amino acid. The most notorious missense mutation is the one that causes sickle cell anemia. In this disease, one of the codons in an important hemoglobin gene has changed from CTC to CAC, resulting in the amino acid valine instead of glutamic acid. Chemically, these two amino acids are very dissimilar, so this simple change has a significant effect on the structure of hemoglobin protein, causing the disease symptoms. A missense mutation might be less significant if the change is between two similar amino acids. For example, a change from CTC (glutamic acid) to CTG (aspartic acid) may not have a dramatic effect on the resulting protein because these two amino acids are similar (both are acidic). Nonsense Mutations and Stop-Codon Mutations Three codons in the genetic code tell the cell to stop adding amino acids to a protein because the end of the gene has been reached. In a nonsense mutation, a codon that stands for an amino acid mutates to one of these three stop codons. (T he term "nonsense mutation" is used because the stop codon has "no sense" for an amino acid—as opposed to a "missense mutation," in which the resulting codon has the "wrong sense" for an amino acid.) Nonsense mutations cause the protein to be cut off early and therefore incomplete, which usually renders it non-functional. Cystic fibrosis is a disease caused by a nonsense mutation. A stop-codon mutation is the opposite of a nonsense mutation: it changes a stop codon into a codon for an amino acid, causing the protein to become too large. The added section may consist of part of another protein from the genome—or it may be complete "gibberish," if the addition comes from a non-coding region of DNA. This lesser-known type of mutation, like a nonsense mutation, generally renders its protein non-functional, and may even result in a harmful protein. A rare disease called familial British dementia is caused by a stop-codon mutation that causes mutated amyloid protein to "clog" the brain (see Nature vol. 399 (1999), pp. 776-781). Further Reading The Discovery of the Link Between Radiation Exposure and Genetic MutationWe Also Recommend... Dna Frameshift Mutations And Their Effect On Gene Expression The Genetic Code Results of 23andMe Genetic Testing Called Into Question The Degeneracy Of The Genetic Code Human Genetic Mutations: Just How Many Mutations Are There?www.brighthub.com/science/genetics/articles/39543.aspx 23andMe?======================= www.brighthub.com/science/genetics/articles/128325.aspx?cid=parsely_rec
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 10, 2014 2:03:13 GMT -5
I will admit here that I have a Big Motive for uncovering Morgellons. Like uncovering what caused Muscular Dystrophy, another life long project. And to disprove that Junk DNA is JUNK, but is filled with Gems, some of them life saving. Now, I have proof. The Encode Project by those who did the genome, because they could not figure out why there is so much of what they call Junk DNA. Yet, they want to be rid of it before they understood it~!
In the beginning was the WORD. DNA is word. UGA AUG, etc. they are 3 letter WORDS. In the Beginning was the WORD: DNA..........not RNA. That is the messenger or the transformer, or the non coding, nonsense, antisense, interfering RNA strands. So, if these 3 letter words were in the beginning, then you have the WORD. Now put those words together and you have linear strands of words with amino acids taking up the base, held together by hydrogen bonds. Now consider those bonds broken and hydrogen releasing its energy, to insert another amino acid or another strand of words, foreign to the human book. What if those strands do not adhere? What if they bundle or aggregate after they were unfolded? Proteins, the way in and out.
First, The overwhelming urge is this: To claim the universal code of genetics and make us all the same. As in animals, plants, humans etc and to ignore the chromosomes. And now say you need to really understand Biology. Oh goodness, Me ~! 23 and Me, just extend the code? that would be the Methylation part. Meanwhile the Histones have another issue, Histonylation. Acetylation, Sumolation etc.....
The genetic code is universal, but there are variations which are thought to be minor. But, they are not arranged the same way. It is all in the arrangement, the perfect order for that particular circle (species) of life. Sure we share genes with the fly, the worm, the Maple, the zebra fish, the frog but they are not arranged in the same manner. How hard is this to figure out~? ... www.bioinformatics.nl/webportal/background/images/geneticcode.gifwww.bioinformatics.nl/webportal/background/geneticcodeinfo.html================================== Okay, about the ENCODE PROJECT: and that ole Junk DNA. And what about those variations? Here is One view, in favor of Evolution:Rare Variants of the Almost Entirely Universal Genetic Code are Evidence of Evolution, Not Design{a revolutionary worker?).....some are paid to put this out there.....oh well.revcom.us/a/1216/gencode.htm=================================== Now, here is another take and evidence that Junk DNA has a purpose.ENCODE Project Writes Eulogy for Junk DNA Elizabeth Pennisi This week, 30 research papers, including six in Nature and additional papers published online by Science, sound the death knell for the idea that our DNA is mostly littered with useless bases. A decade-long project, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE), has found that 80% of the human genome serves some purpose, biochemically speaking. Beyond defining proteins, the DNA bases highlighted by ENCODE specify landing spots for proteins that influence gene activity, strands of RNA with myriad roles, or simply places where chemical modifications serve to silence stretches of our chromosomes. www.sciencemag.org/content/337/6099/1159.summary But, notice ....."landing spots for proteins that influence gene activity"......Aha.....could it be the evolving proteins and they find a niche? But, forced unfolding is not one of them~!========================== www.scientificamerican.com/article/junk-dna-encode/
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 10, 2014 3:11:01 GMT -5
Now, tell me is not Mitochondria what is carried down to descendents? mmmmmmm
We are starting to see what is happening here. It was our variations, our differences, our hereditary information and that is found in the Mitochondria that is to be altered. Remember Mitochondrial Eve? And that is MINOR? Junk DNA is there because it already adapted, it had to, for the carrier to realize that she was carrying a disease. How hard is that to figure out~! but, by the X chromosome not being altered it remained asleep so it did not manifest in the carrier. However, it would in descendents.
So, has the alterations been in the chromosomes? Now, is this making sense? If the X on the female, of which there are two, is altered, even with its Junk attached, it will open up a variation of the disease so it manifests itself, and we begin to lose dystrophin or other important proteins, once they have deliberately unfolded and became bundles in the Junk DNA. Hence, the muscle jumping, and the new form of myotonic muscular dystrophy, which may have a connection to amyloids, prions (which cause wasting disease), Atrophy of muscles, nerves, etc. and amyloid deposites, and also a connection to electrical activity, and sugars, like oligos, glycogens.
You see, the intention was never to cure disease, because by studying the Junk DNA they would have found the reasons and causes of many many diseases. Our bodies try to adapt, some were hit too hard with whatever DNA from other sources unfolded their proteins, folded in other DNA. So to come up with an unfoldig machine which has been done, involves molecules, or the molecular machine, or the nanomachine, to rid us of Junk DNA, the selfish gene, and become all the same. Well...........well.
Now, here is one thing that has been done, to alter us. ================================= www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20154731================================================= So, by Extending the DNA code, by this directed evolution, while ignoring the Junk DNA, will create more diseases, and by saying Junk DNA is evolutionary than that means it was adaptive foreign dna, and that is the clue to the cause of the disease manifested, like Morgellons, Amyloidosis, ALz, even Lymes, because the DNA of the Lymes would be evident. Some real good DNA tests for people who know what they are doing would be beneficial to us and the Lymes folks. I hope the folks with ENCODE stick to their guns. I believe their eyes were opened. ================================================== Extending the DNA Code: No Barriers to expand the code?www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15138302============
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 10, 2014 16:39:23 GMT -5
....." design and generation of an orthogonal synthetase/tRNA pair derived from archaeal tRNA(Lys) sequences that efficiently and selectively incorporates an unnatural amino acid into proteins in response to the quadruplet codon, AGGA. "................:"two unnatural amino acids, hGln and O-methyl-L-tyrosine, at distinct positions within myoglobin" Here is an example: of this tRNA(Lys) from archaea. How did that get there, making Lymes basically a modified disease? Archaeal-type lysyl-tRNA synthetase in the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferiAnalysis of B. burgdorferi mRNA showed that the lysyl-tRNA synthetase-encoding gene is highly expressed, confirming that B. burgdorferi contains a functional class I-type lysyl-tRNA synthetase. The detection of an archaeal-type lysyl-tRNA synthetase in B. burgdorferi and other pathogenic spirochetes, but not to date elsewhere in bacteria or eukarya, indicates that the gene that encodes this enzyme has a common origin with its orthologue from the archaeal kingdom. This difference between the lysyl-tRNA synthetases of spirochetes and their hosts may be readily exploitable for the development of anti-spirochete therapeutics. ...." B. burgdorferi contains a functional class I-type LysRS, in contrast to its mammalian hosts, which contain class II-type enzymes. This fundamental difference between pathogen and host in an essential enzyme suggests that LysRS may be exploitable as a target for the development of Lyme disease antibiotics. "................. www.pnas.org/content/94/26/14383.full======================= So, the target for pharma of the agent used in this evolutionary process to incoroporate archaea into the human genome, is this ...:archaeal-type lysyl-tRNA synthetase in B. burgdorferi", What is it made of? From triple codons to quads. ============================ www.landesbioscience.com/pdf/Ibba08Ambrogelly.pdfThe Amber codon...... UAA is a stop codon, so at the stop codons these are inserted in while the native codon is silent and breaks down, dna breaks so the protein in retro can be part of the amino, thereby expanding the code to incorporate this foreign adaptive protein.Mutations are done here. DNA is read, edited, so the circle begins again, in different format. All because of the addition of 3 amino acids from archaea or the lab or selfassembling nano. Biochemistry.---------------------- AGGA: aggA is a gene locus found in plant-associated bacteria that agglutinate. See agglutination (biology). AGGA may refer to: Agalinis gattingeri, the roundstem false foxglove plant (USDA code: AGGA) AGGA, a common DNA sequence Aggregate access, an Internet protocol formally known as Aggregate Server Access Protocol en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agga================================ Biosynthesis of an antifungal oligopeptide in Burkholderia ...... the bacterium was classified to belong to B. contaminans, and a 22.7-kb genetic locus was demonstrated to be required for the antifungal ... catalog 201TP54) on a Bio-Rad BioLogic F10 Duo Flow with Quad Tec UV-Vis Detector system. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization ... (AGGA), and ... sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X09001156 More from sciencedirect.com ----------------------------- B. contaminans, [/b] microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Burkholderia_contaminans====================== An archaean from hydrovent. Venters collection of species to add to data bases. Sorcerer I and the Sargasso Sea Event? Speaking of Adaptation, and Chemtrails were not involved in this~! =================== onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02343.x/full=========================== Or Chronic Lymes: because this is now in the Junk DNA, but still active. So you can see the 17 strains of this and that is why Lymes is so varied as is Morgellons, but Morgellons involves one of the other amino acids; the unnatural amino acid. The 21st and 22nd are from the environment(extreme environments), while the unnatural is just that. From a jar on a shelf? or inorganic chemistry which walked into biochemistry, which walked into organic chemistry. this is presumably a clear distinction between Lymes Disease and Morgellons and people may be carrying elements of both. Some, may have just Morgellons. Skyship
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 10, 2014 19:30:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by DonZ on Feb 11, 2014 8:43:26 GMT -5
Skyship; I think you'll find this interesting. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844337"Conjugative DNA transfer into human cells by the VirB/VirD4 type IV secretion system of the bacterial pathogen Bartonella henselae." microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Bartonella_henselae"Bartonella are the only bacteria able to produce angiogenic tumors in humans, very much like the Agrobacterium species that produce tumors in plants" link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01708232"Only aminoglycosides display in vitro bactericidal activity against intracellularBartonella species; therefore, they are recommended for treatment of Bartonella infections." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aminoglycoside"Aminoglycosides have several potential antibiotic mechanisms, some as protein synthesis inhibitors, although their exact mechanism of action is not fully known:" www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-06/f-aat060811.php"From familiar fungicidal and bactericidal peptides the research scientists produced sequence variations and tested them in vitro on various microbes. Putrefactive bacteria, for example, were incubated for an hour with the artificially produced antimicrobial peptides. As the new peptides contain cationic amino acid residues, they can bond with the negatively charged bacterial membrane and penetrate it. In their tests the research scientists compared the survivability of the pathogens with an untreated control. The experts focused on peptides with a length of less than 20 amino acids. "Antibiotic peptides unlock their microbicidal effect within a few minutes. They also work at a concentration of less than 1 µM, compared with conventional antibiotics which require a concentration of 10 µM," states Schubert, summarizing the test results. "The spectrum of efficacy of the tested peptides includes not only bacteria and molds but also lipid-enveloped viruses. Another key factor is that the peptides identified in our tests do not harm healthy body cells," the scientist explains." www.researchmoringa.com/18_Amino_Acids.html
|
|
|
Post by DonZ on Feb 11, 2014 11:23:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kritters on Feb 11, 2014 21:37:29 GMT -5
Just an aside, I've read that resveratrol is produced by the developing grape in order to keep fungus at bay. If pesticides are used, as in conventionally grown grapes, the grape does not produce resveratrol.
EAT AND DRINK ORGANIC!!!
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 12, 2014 1:13:08 GMT -5
Don, This info verifies that the second eukaryotic interuption besides agro in plants was this in humans. Uses the same secretion system T4SS..... Citovsky even says this: this uses the secretion system, just like in the plant. Same type of subunits. So, the agro in plants and the bartonella in humans, but conjugations as well. Here Citovsky says this: He was the first to claim that agro changes human dna, then recinded and here could be why. It uses the agro secretion system, but not the agro, bartonella instead? f1000.com/prime/12877956?key=g6f9rms99czgnv5--------------------------------- So, another evolutionary event, after the advent of the agro T4SS. Now, the connection to the heat shock proteins. That is where I was going next. Thank you again for mentioning the agro. May not be same system if Bartonella was used, this one specific to humans, and seems to be involved with the Cat Scratch fever, which many at beginning Morgellons did have or thought they had. All over the place. These are subunits of this system or mechanism as they call it.====================================== Yes,l did find that link very interesting, points to a lot. Skyship
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 12, 2014 1:29:06 GMT -5
images of Bartonella: the two types. www.picsearch.com/imageDetail.cgi?id=E3LbSqcrb7rJnXoxQapQNi9JGJDO1PGZhJjOJqoxqGM&start=1&q=bartonella%20bacteriaHere is where the heat shock proteins come in. The T4SS is the needle.....from your link to Bartonella..... ========================== microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Bartonella_henselae======================= Don Z,
Thank you. I knew we were on the same page, just not quite communicating, or I was not hearing you. Now I am. Sometimes I get dense.================= I have been looking at hsp27, but an even smaller one the 10, subunits of this mechanism. How it gets past the Immune system~! ======================= distinct from other heat shock protein members, whose soluble form is recognized as danger signal by immune cells and triggers immune responses, Hsp10 after release, however, is designed to be an inhibitory signal by limiting immune response. This review discusses how Hsp10 participates in various physiological and pathological processes from basic protein molecule folding to pregnancy, cancer and autoimmune diseases, and emphasizes how important the location is for the function exertion of a molecule.www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180030/================\ The "molten globule" is important: Hsp10 does not have a N-terminal signal peptide for the secretion, suggesting that its extracellular exportation has to be proceeded through a non-classical endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi-independent pathway. Although the mechanisms of leaderless protein secretion are much incompletely understood, two main pathways have been proposed. First, some proteins such as FGF-1 and IL-1α, can translocate across the plasma membrane through the formation of multiprotein complexes as a “molten globule” formIt has been conjectured that heat shock stimulates this pathway by allowing Hsp10 to partially unfold, as partial unfolding is required for membrane translocation of many proteins.
The second pathway by which IL-1β crosses membrane, involves entry of the secreted protein into endolysosomes and release from the cell by a vesiculation mechanism [18]. And such mechanism probably requires the activity of ATP binding cassette transporters and the likely participation of purinergic receptors [19]. In addition, some secreted nuclear proteins, such as high mobility protein b1 (HMGB1) and engrailed-2, appear to be secreted through special pathway under specialized conditions that promote secretion [20,21]. Interestingly, the secreting pathways of Hsp60 and Hsp70 have been widely studied, and these chaperones seem to be released to the extracellular space via an alternative pathway mediated by exosomes [22–25]. Based on these findings, it is reasonable to speculate that similar secreting pathway(s) is employed to Hsp10 for its extracellular secretion.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180030/
==================
Now back to bartonella and its heat shock proteins. 6 species so far. like the lymes borellia I posted above, so many, why we have various symtoms. and this is in the mitchondrial cells which does change human DNA.Some conjugations going on for sure.
======================
www.veterinaryresearch.org/content/43/1/15
=======================
This form: is the bundle filaments.......
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 12, 2014 15:54:32 GMT -5
Helicobacter and other bacterias use same unit as well as Bartonellajb.asm.org/content/188/3/882.full--------------------------------------- But the T4SS components are there, so those components, each from the different species are present. Different operons are used, but it seems they are to knockout those genes and kills the pathogen, but seems it can also alter mitochondria, was that the main aim? To make us all Universal as in all DNA. The only variations from the Universal Code were mitochondria and microbes. So, what was changed? Mitochondria is the hereditary dna. What is passed down. So, to mutate into these cells of certain heredity, will cause new diseases, for sure. new mutations. Why change mitochondria? The thing about mitochondria is that it is structural, cytoskeleton, involves cells all over body. And.........they have their own dna, unlike dna of other cells. Darwin's The Origin Variation of Speciesarticle by Mario Seiglie If you were to write a book, would you purposefully pick a title that doesn't truly deal with the subject matter? It sounds ridiculous, but that's what Charles Darwin did.The Origin of Species , as the title is often abbreviated, is listed among the most influential books ever written. "Next to the Bible," anthropologist Ashley Montagu claims, "no work has been quite as influential, in virtually every aspect of human thought, as The Origin of Species" ( The Origin of Species, 1958, Mentor edition, quote on the back cover). However, did this book really deal with the origin of species or only with the variation of species?One view: www.ucg.org/science/darwins-origin-variation-species/===================================================== We are not supposed to know about this? Any thinking person can figure it out though~! www.bookstewards.com/shop/darwins-variation/This is the book that tells the story:===================================== The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication by Charles Darwin Overview Charles Darwin (1809–1882) first published this work in 1868 in two volumes. The book began as an expansion of the first two chapters of On the Origin of Species: 'Variation under Domestication' and 'Variation under Nature' and it developed into one of his largest works; Darwin referred to it as his 'big book'. In volume 2, concerned with how species inherit particular characteristics, Darwin first published his 'provisional hypothesis' of pangenesis. This theory of 'gemmules' was not met with much acceptance and.. www.barnesandnoble.com/w/variation-of-animals-and-plants-under-domestication-charles-darwin/1100105679?ean=9781108014236============================================ Besides the Origin of Species, why was not this collection put out there? It is variations that makes one unique, individual, we all have them. But, to focus on them and know you could change them by direct evolution was what took off.
And that is what is focused on. You study the variations and then eliminate them. This was a big operation, done through environment. To make the Universal code work, you had to eliminate the variations, but, had to find out what they were first. That is what is being done here, so humans will all be genetically the same homologous with nature. No variations. Junk DNA tells of the variations and purpose is disclosed in their structures.
So, as in Muscular Dystrophy, unlock the X mutations in the carrier, and the carrier will show another variation of the disease as it manifests in a new type. The one carried has the original muscular dystrophy, but the junk dna puts it aside for the natural survival of the host carrier.
Same with Morgellons, hidden in mitochondrial genes, which effect the cytoskeleton, which has been rearranged. Now, the mutation is in the host, but the host is not supposed to be effected, except when it is manifested by opening up the X for variation studies to further the alterations for perfection. Not to cure the disease caused by the initial mutations. This took a few generations to do. And by perfecting this to make universal code of all humans, new mutations are made. We suffer from these mutations. Some proteins are deleted, some folded in with use of the new amino acids, which were never in the human before. This is in the chromosomes. So, what was the hidden purpose of "23 and Me". Also involved in Google, Darpa and the Singularity? What does Methylation do?======================================== 5-azacytidine Experiments Provide Early Clues to the Role of Methylation in Gene Expression
Prior to 1980, there were a number of clues that suggested that methylation might play a role in the regulation of gene expression. For example, J. D. McGhee and G. D. Ginder compared the methylation status of the beta-globin locus in cells that did and did not express this gene. Using restriction enzymes that distinguished between methylated and unmethylated DNA, the duo showed that the beta-globin locus was essentially unmethylated in cells that expressed beta-globin but methylated in other cell types (McGhee & Ginder, 1979). This and other evidence of the time were indirect suggestions that methylation was somehow involved in gene expression.
Shortly after McGhee and Ginder published their results, a more direct experiment that examined the effects of inhibiting methylation on gene expression was performed using 5-azacytidine in mouse cells. 5-azacytidine is one of many chemical analogs for the nucleoside cytidine. When these analogs are integrated into growing DNA strands, some, including 5-azacytidine, severely inhibit the action of the DNA methyltransferase enzymes that normally methylate DNA. (Interestingly, other analogs, like Ara-C, do not negatively impact methylation.) Because most DNA methylation was known to occur on cytosine residues, scientists hypothesized that if they inhibited methylation by flooding cellular DNA with 5-azacytidine, then they could compare cells before and after treatment to see what impact the loss of methylation had on gene expression. Knowing that gene expression changes are responsible for cellular differentiation, these researchers used changes in cellular phenotypes as a proxy for gene expression changes (Table 1; Jones & Taylor, 1980).
H3-K9 methylation (methylation of a specific lysine residue in the histone H3) is required in order for DNA methylation to take place. However, exceptions have been observed in which the relationship is reversed. In one study, for example, H3 methylation was reduced at a tumor suppressor gene in cells deficient in DNA methyltransferase (Martin & Zhang, 2005).
In an interestingly coordinated process, proteins that bind to methylated DNA also form complexes with the proteins involved in deacetylation of histones. Therefore, when DNA is methylated, nearby histones are deacetylated, resulting in compounded inhibitory effects on transcription. Likewise, demethylated DNA does not attract deacetylating enzymes to the histones, allowing them to remain acetylated and more mobile, thus promoting transcription.
In most cases, methylation of DNA is a fairly long-term, stable conversion, but in some cases, such as in germ cells, when silencing of imprinted genes must be reversed, demethylation can take place to allow for "epigenetic reprogramming." The exact mechanisms for demethylation are not entirely understood; however, it appears that this process may be mediated by the removal of amino groups by DNA deaminases (Morgan et al., 2004). After deamination, the DNA has a mismatch and is repaired, causing it to become demethylated. In fact, studies using inhibitors of one DNMT enzyme showed that this enzyme was involved in not only DNA methylation, but also in the removal of amino groups. www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/The-Role-of-Methylation-in-Gene-Expression-1070============================= Interesting what was used to change histone 3: We cloned ARGONAUTE4 (AGO4) from a screen for mutants that suppress silencing of the Arabidopsis SUPERMAN (SUP) gene. The ago4-1 mutant reactivated silent SUP alleles and decreased CpNpG and asymmetric DNA methylation as well as histone H3 lysine-9 methylation. In addition, ago4-1 blocked histone and DNA methylation and the accumulation of 25-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that correspond to the retroelement AtSN1. These results suggest that AGO4 and long siRNAs direct chromatin modifications, including histone methylation and non-CpG DNA methylation. www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/12522258/ARGONAUTE4_control_of_locus_specific_siRNA_accumulation_and_DNA_and_histone_methylation_==============================
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 12, 2014 17:57:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 12, 2014 18:05:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 12, 2014 18:07:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 12, 2014 18:29:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Feb 12, 2014 18:45:42 GMT -5
Morgies are "if this feature appeared accidentally, in a few individuals only, and was therefore submitted to the law of all accidental changes? " My anger has subsided, but, it is smoldering. How did they do this? foods and environment, using the RNA polymerase II. This is in the flu. It is in the environment, even so noted by NIH, now. A bit late? the difference was the origin of life, is claimed to be RNA, not DNA. DNA was there first, always was......... RNA is the messenger of light, which is DNA. From the environmental big picture to the alterations or depletion of our own variations. The junk DNA will tell the story. Can you say it is still Junk? Then why did we need the capacitor? The latest tech capacitor: the small small picture....... makerflux.com/the-accidental-supercapacitor/skyship
|
|