|
Post by aqt on Mar 3, 2014 18:00:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 4, 2014 15:25:26 GMT -5
So, a light can read a biosensor. A wavelenght of light, like a laser. Biacore. Label free meaning no RFID tag needed, just the biosensor. So this is one of the hexagon type shapes. It appears this wavelength light can read the sensor. Would be inside the surface of anything. They use in lab or in open I suppose.www.rci.rutgers.edu/~longhu/Biacore/pdf_files/SPR_TechNote.pdf Graphene Oxide Based Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors chemical modification amine-reactive EDC/NHS estersAQT,
The HEX? uses the hex shape to make the bucky tube, they hook together and form the tube. Once in layer they roll and form tube. Then becomes a filament. The filament extends, like those little tubes that stretched, when we we kids. You put one finger in one end of the tube, another in the other and you can stretch it? That is how they work, yet they grip to your fingers? What were those called? They were made of threads like a matrix?
If you rolled the material in the image below and made a tube. make sense?www.intechopen.com/source/html/44351/media/image1_w.jpg It starts out as a hexagon, the glittery stuff we used to find? or still do?These charges can be at the end of the polymer like filaments.
So these biosensors can be at sides of tube, all around making a sheet like material, then rolling that sheetlike material, but resin or epoxy must be present, I would think, to hold the graphene in the circular tube shape, the charges would be in the hex shapes with mirror like qualities for images or reflection In this case this " chemical modification amine-reactive EDC/NHS esters" EDC/NHS esters? It is amine reactive, remember the 3 added amines? Selenocysteine, Pyrrolysine and the N-formylmethionine? Those are the three using the SECIS, PYLIS and the unnatural amino acid.more on that particular ester. S
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 4, 2014 15:45:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 4, 2014 16:22:21 GMT -5
So, we have biosensors, and biomolecules. Sulfo-NHS ester targets cell surface proteins: www.gentoprice.com/sulfo-nhs-biotin.htmPoly -L- lysine? iopscience.iop.org/0957-4484/7/3/021We can supply a wide variety of analog nucleotides for anti-cancer/anti-viral research. For your imagination we offer the following list of possibilities for the custom synthesis of analog nucleotides: We offer custom synthesis of mono di and triphosphates of many modified (analog) nucleosides based on: purine and pyrimidine ribosides, arabino nucleosides, carbocyclic nucleosides and acyclic nucleosides. We offer modifications of the adenine, thymine, guanine, cytosine, uracil, adenosine, guanosine, thymidine, cytidine and uridine bases. The types of modifications available for our custom synthesized analog nucleoside mono, di and triphosphates include acyclo, alkyl, amino, arabino, aza, azido, azole, borano, carbocyclic, chloro, deaza, diamino, dideoxy, dihydro, fluoro, hydroxy, indole, iodo, iso, lyxo, mercapto, methoxy, methyl, nitro, oxo, propynyl, pseudo, pyrrole, thio plus many other modifications. customnucleotides.com/=========================== On the cell nucleus level. ================ mmobilization of Biomolecule and small molecules for breaking through in future medicine Bio-Synthesis provides custom biomolecule immobilization of inorganic nano or macroparticles to be used in applications such as ligand purification, magnetic resonance, fluorescence imaging, cell targeting, diagnostic assay and drug delivery. Using proprietary coating technologies, we offer exceptionally low background, consistent quality and reproducibility. We custom design and cross link biomolecules onto various solid media. We can link biomolecules such as antibodies and their fragments, proteins (soluble and membrane proteins), enzymes, nucleic acids and their analogs, peptides, peptidomimetics, fluorescent compounds, biotin and avidin/streptavidin onto nano or macroparticles such as: glass, plates, nitrocellulose membranes, polystyrene, dextran gels, resins, nanogold, nanosphere, nanocrystal, microsphere, magnetic or luminex beads and qDot. www.biosyn.com/Biomolecule-Immobilization.aspx
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 4, 2014 16:24:39 GMT -5
Biopolymers Protein: Enzyme, antibodies, antigens, cell adhesion molecules Peptides: Synthetic polypeptides Saccharides: Sugars, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides Lipids: Fatty acids, phospholipids, glycolipids and any fat-like substances. Ligands: Hormone receptors, cell surface receptors, avidin and biotin, small molecules Nucleic acids and nucleotides: DNA, RNA, PNA, nucleic acid analogs and genomic DNA Others: Conjugated or mixtures of any the above www.biosyn.com/Biomolecule-Immobilization.aspx
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 4, 2014 16:37:35 GMT -5
synthetic polypeptides PNA: Poly nucleic acids The proportion of polypeptide chains which generate native folds—Part 1: analysis of reduced codon set experiments by Royal Truman Creationist scientists and Intelligent Design proponents have drawn attention to the sparseness of native-like folded proteins among random polypeptide sequences. Contrary to this opinion, it was alleged that protein folds are very common among random amino acid chains. We found this to be a surprising opinion, and this statement and the references cited prompted this six-part series. We review the best-known lines of evidence used to claim that random polypeptides often lead to native-like folds. We conclude that although a good estimate of the proportion of true native-like folds remains unknown, it is astronomically small. In Part 1 we address protein-folding experiments that are based on proteins constructed of very few but specified types of amino acids. \ creation.com/native-folds-in-polypeptide-chains-1It seems there is a polypeptide problem? More reading in connection to the resonance issue. s
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 4, 2014 19:03:05 GMT -5
The creation of the polypeptide is the problem and they knew it~! I think NIH is trying to remedy this, but is it too late? Keeping resonance in mind examining the polypeptide: ARTIFICIAL RNA ....not artifial DNA. They cannot erase that and they knew that. But, the polypeptides fall apart yet damage us. So, through the ribose. RNA hypothesis? wrong from the beginning of this substitution? RNA-Ribonucleic Acids Ribonucleic acid, or RNA, is a nucleic acid very similar to DNA. Its structure is the same, although it is usually found single-stranded instead of double stranded like DNA. In place of deoxyribose, RNA has ribose, and in place of the base thymine, RNA has uracil. But with all these structural similarities to DNA, the function can’t differ too much either, right? That assumption couldn’t be more wrong. library.thinkquest.org/04apr/00217/en/biology/rna/index.html=================================== library.thinkquest.org/04apr/00217/images/content/_thb_tRNA.jpggotta go back in archives, only saved 6 times: encrypted.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.esb.utexas.edu%2Fmabrybio211%2Fchapter05%2Fch5.htm&tbs=imgo:1#filter=0&q=http://www.esb.utexas.edu/mabrybio211/chapter05/ch5.htm&tbm=isch&tbs=imgo:1Note the hexagon shapes~! The Cloverleaf Project is also in the Aerosol Operations-----Chemtrails. This is chemistry. nano building block is chemistry, in their minds. s
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 4, 2014 19:04:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 7, 2014 23:01:19 GMT -5
What these SPR (surface plasmon resononces) can do is carry the plasmon resonance nanopartles which are metals. It seems on such projects strangely named the NAOMI Project: is supposedly not the one and the same Namoi Project with the "K" problem in the Bioweapon Project Namoi. Or is it? K problem can be physics or it can be the K problem in Project Naomi which cuts you some slack in not Killing you (K) problem but maiming you, disabling you, paralyzing you, and they found a way to do it with something that acts like a muscle relaxant. First if you have not seen this: please note the K problem with Proj Naomi. This seems to be involved in the Morgellons syndrome.
==========================
=======================
So, it looks like something was found to fit the K problem criteria............ Now consider this NA O MI project. Are we talking one and the same project? Like the RNA Cloverleaf Project, the cruciform, the sacrifice, I call it? We have to sacrifice Tyrosine to the new RNA interference protein. The ncRNA problem, done by wave? particles? quantum dots? SPR or Plasmon nanoparticles? Muscles have electricity, right? What does electricity do to muscles? Even Duchenne and Alzheimer himself knew.
=============================
===============
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 7, 2014 23:32:13 GMT -5
So, could these microresonators be the real deal. The K problem in microresonators? or the nanoparticles controlled by the laser? Optical communications had been made possible due to extremely high transparency of optical fibers fabricated of silica. The same crucial property of silica is explored in microscopic photonic devices fabricated of the optical fiber. The simplest of these devices is a silica spherical microresonator which confines optical whispering gallery modes (WGMs) launched into the microsphere by evanescent coupling. WGMs circulate near the microsphere surface and cannot escape due to the total internal reflection. A microsphere can be fabricated by melting the end of the fiber in a flame so that the fiber tip assumes a round shape determined by the surface tension of liquid silica. Due to the very high transparency of silica, the WGM microresonators exhibit enormous Q-factors as large as a billion. For this reason, they perform much better than photonic microresonators fabricated lithographically and prone to etch-induced losses. The disadvantage of spherical and ellipsoidal WGM microresonators is their limited functionality restricted by the shape and their inability of integration into complex photonic circuits. The problem of expanding the functionality of super high Q-factor silica microresonators was addressed and solved at OFS Labs. Here we briefly overview the most representative examples of novel microresonators invented and demonstrated at OFS Labs: the Microfiber Coil Resonator, the Bottle Microresonator, and the Bubble Microresonator. Finally, we describe our new technological platform enabling fabrication of complex super-low-loss coupled microresonators and photonic integrated circuits from a silica fiber with unprecedented sub-angstrom precision – Surface Nanoscale Axial Photonics (SNAP). ...SNAP circuits may have potential applications in filtering, switching, slowing light, and sensing. They can potentially be incorporated into silicon photonics integrated circuits by replacing the components with unacceptable attenuation and insufficient fabrication precision...... www.specialtyphotonics.com/microresonators.html
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 8, 2014 0:20:29 GMT -5
This would involve silica fibers, but these are used in devices, like cell phone, small computers etc. However if the goal is to incorporate wireless into the human body, no need for computers, will have that in contacts or inside the body. But, these can be sensors as well.
If you can get the book: The Future of Physics, by Michio Kaku en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_of_the_Future and his latest: The Future Of The Mind. www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/bookreviews/10662830/The-Future-of-the-Mind-by-Michio-Kaku-review.html============== A second focus in Kaku’s tour of possible futures is superhuman intelligence, whether in our biological or mechanical successors. He is sceptical of the claims of singularity apostle Ray Kurzweil that the ability to upload a brain on to a computer will be feasible within a couple of decades. Good evidence supports his scepticism. As the technologist and science-fiction writer Ramez Naam argues, the problems to be overcome are non-linear. Man may be, in Nietzsche’s phrase, a bridge not a goal, but the chances are that we are a bridge with some way to go.
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 8, 2014 0:37:07 GMT -5
Now, Kaku says in The Future of Physics that this process of aiming for the nanoprocessor, In the NA O MI project, Nano and micro work together. Their work is to work out the em and biomolecules in relations to proteins. The way into the body. So, what we have are the biomolecular assemblers. They had to start at micro and then went to micro nano. or NAno On MIcro......... NA O MI....so both are need to progress this process.
Drexler had the plan, Smalley is selling nanoproducts, but, does not agree that the nano assembler is possible or if it is it won't be till the end of century. So, I am wondering who has produced them, and are using them?
Has a microresonator been made and is being used? I believe that Sandia had something to do with it. It has teeth, like the comb they talk of. Relates to Smart Meters, smart nps, Smart filaments etc. You will be charged like Deborah Tavares talks of: She was on www.Rense.com Mar 8, 2014. She says that Obama (on the White House website) plans to increase the frequencies. We do not need to put the Smart meters up~! More on the website. stopthecrime.net Climate Action Plans. Nature does its own thing, we do not need GeoEngineering, so we can see where these collaborators work and how they do it. NREL in this big time, plus so many more. We need to join the Tribal Governments. They are Sovereign. We are but everyone is asleep, no one is at the helm as we roll over the lying nano experts and their hidden tech, with what is reality. This is not what Drexler and Smalley were saying. Energy finds are constantly changing. ===============================
|
|
|
Post by skyship on Mar 8, 2014 2:45:51 GMT -5
|
|