Post by skyship on Dec 8, 2009 2:50:15 GMT -5
To understand the thinking of those who wish to re engineer
human life and the environment, think of the human as
adaptative species, as you would the polar bear, he is fine,
he just moved further north for a while.
What do we do, when the environment atmosphere is being
changed to bring about an adaptation. Global warming
is not causing this the Aerosol operations which can make
global warming happen is, and can change at will. Global cooling
as well, if global warming doesn't work.
And our government approved this with congress's okay
on the Hutchinson bill.
and it says in the passed legislation that government can use things of like manner for "weather modification and for other purposes"
My concern is the "other purposes"
Now, notice how evolution is described here, as part
of the plan.
======================
"Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6. Burch, C. L., Chao, L. (1999). Genetics 151:921-927.
Fisher's geometric model of adaptive evolution argues that adaptive evolution should generally result from the substitution of many mutations of small effect because advantageous mutations of small effect should be more common than those of large effect. However, evidence for both evolution by small steps and for Fisher's model has been mixed. Here we report supporting results from a new experimental test of the model. We subjected the bacteriophage phi6 to intensified genetic drift in small populations and caused viral fitness to decline through the accumulation of a deleterious mutation. We then propagated the mutated virus at a range of larger population sizes and allowed fitness to recover by natural selection. Although fitness declined in one large step, it was usually recovered in smaller steps. More importantly, step size during recovery was smaller with decreasing size of the recovery population. These results confirm Fisher's main prediction that advantageous mutations of small effect should be more common. We also show that the advantageous mutations of small effect are compensatory mutations whose advantage is conditional (epistatic) on the presence of the deleterious mutation, in which case the adaptive landscape of phi6 is likely to be very rugged."......
www.mansfield.ohio-state.edu/~sabedon/bgnws002.htm#abstract_4919
so many created:
Bacteriophage library?
here is one:
sounds like they make antibodies to match the bacteriophage
or to eat certain bacteria.
HuCAL bacteriophage
well, we can find what kind of thing they are to put to rest,
sorta going at this donkey backwards, but, it might work
bacteriphages work like antibodies, or antigen against bacteria,
however viral genes are used, so one gets a virus to kill the bacteria, and they say is harmless to humans. works in place of vaccines and antibiotics, or is put in them?
www.abdserotec.com/custom/hucal_references-462.html
www.reference-global.com/doi/abs/10.1515/BC.2007.070
www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-116498571.html
All done by mutation, deliberate mutations! such small
matters! mmmmmm
skyship
human life and the environment, think of the human as
adaptative species, as you would the polar bear, he is fine,
he just moved further north for a while.
What do we do, when the environment atmosphere is being
changed to bring about an adaptation. Global warming
is not causing this the Aerosol operations which can make
global warming happen is, and can change at will. Global cooling
as well, if global warming doesn't work.
And our government approved this with congress's okay
on the Hutchinson bill.
and it says in the passed legislation that government can use things of like manner for "weather modification and for other purposes"
My concern is the "other purposes"
Now, notice how evolution is described here, as part
of the plan.
======================
"Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6. Burch, C. L., Chao, L. (1999). Genetics 151:921-927.
Fisher's geometric model of adaptive evolution argues that adaptive evolution should generally result from the substitution of many mutations of small effect because advantageous mutations of small effect should be more common than those of large effect. However, evidence for both evolution by small steps and for Fisher's model has been mixed. Here we report supporting results from a new experimental test of the model. We subjected the bacteriophage phi6 to intensified genetic drift in small populations and caused viral fitness to decline through the accumulation of a deleterious mutation. We then propagated the mutated virus at a range of larger population sizes and allowed fitness to recover by natural selection. Although fitness declined in one large step, it was usually recovered in smaller steps. More importantly, step size during recovery was smaller with decreasing size of the recovery population. These results confirm Fisher's main prediction that advantageous mutations of small effect should be more common. We also show that the advantageous mutations of small effect are compensatory mutations whose advantage is conditional (epistatic) on the presence of the deleterious mutation, in which case the adaptive landscape of phi6 is likely to be very rugged."......
www.mansfield.ohio-state.edu/~sabedon/bgnws002.htm#abstract_4919
so many created:
Bacteriophage library?
here is one:
sounds like they make antibodies to match the bacteriophage
or to eat certain bacteria.
HuCAL bacteriophage
well, we can find what kind of thing they are to put to rest,
sorta going at this donkey backwards, but, it might work
bacteriphages work like antibodies, or antigen against bacteria,
however viral genes are used, so one gets a virus to kill the bacteria, and they say is harmless to humans. works in place of vaccines and antibiotics, or is put in them?
www.abdserotec.com/custom/hucal_references-462.html
www.reference-global.com/doi/abs/10.1515/BC.2007.070
www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-116498571.html
All done by mutation, deliberate mutations! such small
matters! mmmmmm
skyship