Recombination and homeobox genes.
Genes in plants and animals and humans that are the same or like them
Proteins from plants animals human fungi, etc.
Yeast Artificial Chomosome
Bacterial Artificial chromosome
Human artificial chromosome
It is an attempt to change the human genome.
What was the genome about?
Homeobox genes or HOX genes.
Homeobox
A homeobox is a DNA sequence found within genes that are involved in the regulation of patterns of development (morphogenesis) in animals, fungi and plants.
Note patterns of development;
Hox genes : 'The Molecular Architects'
www.irishscientist.ie/2000/contents.asp?contentxml=156s.xml&contentxsl=insight3.xslfor a start
============================
tt part of this but it has gone on for over 150 years and maybe before.
Evidently, they were working on the zebra gene, you have heard of the
genetically modified zebra fish?
The models used were meant to be there.
Yeast. S. cerevis. first used, forms prions. different from the cjd and tse.
This was a constructed event, from you links yes, but there is more to the Morgellon
story, there are other events.
We are in process.
Many of us have seen the critter up close, insect genes, fly genes, the yeast itself.
So, please keep an open mind, there was an evolutionary plan, it involves directed
forced evolution. into artificial synthesis.
But, it began where human genome could be accessed.
The environment, buckballs and dna compare the sizes, compare the sizes
of dna in your body to the smaller ones in your body, relate to actin
myosin, motility in cells, this is where molecular is now.
How big is dna, proteins in dna, enzymes , polypeptides,
What happens when proteins leave the body?
A gene or more hox box from dicty integrated into body parts.
So, if you can identify the actual genes, the smaller ones, the clear fibers,
ribbon like single strands.
Amino acids...........etc........
It is in the molecular, and it is in microbiology, the hidden files.
How many microbioligsts have died in last 20 years, unusual deaths?
Over 100!
This is not conspiracy, is truth!
Why>? what did they know?
we need the microbiologist files, from there the molecular will fit.
Frietas knows this. He is into tranforming the code, and artificially
and use of nanobots to heal the body, they are made of nano.
This is part of the plan.
I can see where this can be laid down in someones lap, but, there
is much more.
I have followed those who know the dna code of many many things.
Junk DNa in some of us has been activated or shut off, because junk dna was considered
to have no value. Yes it does!
This is a huge fight in the science world.
So keep an open mind! Much good science has been repressed, or stolen,
There is a whole new world out there, of people who know what has happened.
They will help us, and some already are. But, how will they keep their jobs, now?
The Health care bill, just made that possible, control of human health. It is bigger
than just a virus, fungi, lichen, protozoan, human.
Selection and adaptation of human species.
You may think I am off here, but, this cannot be identified in the normal manner.
We are rejected, period! already, but, there is still something we have like
ancient genes, that cannot be altered, we are rejecting the change!
TT said this is a protein, we are rejecting the protein alteration.
The protein aggregates, the strands are in the balls of fibers.
Black ones, red ones, green ones, clear ones, white ones,
Green fluorescent protein from jelly fish, from other things used for markers.
This has been a process, and continues, we have electrical jolts in us.
Even Erasmus Darwin knew the filament of life and the spark of life.
I do not want to see us wasting more time on testing, that will cost us,
Until we find the core, and the plan, we are testing for fungus, for
carbon balls, related to carbon buckyball.
We have been at this for a long time, because many Morgies have
different symtoms at different times, but when it gets to pancreas
where most genetic recombination acts, you know this is in the
system. The brain is effected, the gut, the lungs, the skin,
coming from inside of us, not outside. The pheromones trigger
the pheromones from insects, they are drawn to us.
They carry gene alterings as well.
The fungal pathogens cannot be cultured, because there is no known Morgellons
pathogen registered other than observations and papers done by those
who look at all sides.
Check out Carl Woese. and Archaea.
There has been a continual pattern following all of this, including Aids, Lymes disease,
Alzheimers, no Morgellons. Crosses bio, men/women from Iraq have this,
so, I am not trying to be a poo poo, but, I have spent countless hours, observation
what people have posted in photos, and in real live patterns, and have looked
at specimens over and over, I have read Dr. H's work, I have read Dr. Smiths reports
from NOrthern Arizona, Dr. Wymores work, MRF, Dr Harvey, there is a gag
put on this, so people are not aware what is going on.
Yet,. there are people who know what this is, and are part of the plan.
What we are are citizen scientists, and we are uncovering this ourselves.
TT a wing from butterfly pattern, the protein in that gene that direct
manipulation, it is put in a dna library. to be used at will.
that pattern can form inside our skin. The wing pattern protein itself.
Like the dicty gene, hox box gene from that put in human because it is
LIKE the human gene, not the native gene.
So, if you can see that genes through epigenics is making this happen.
Sorry to be so long, but, we have been down many of these same areas,
so what we have come up with is being revistied on many of these
threads.
Once we find how the new molecular cell was created and what was used,
along the way.
We have the CB001 the cyano, it is named.
We have the protein from trypanasoma protozoan used in heat shock proteins.
We have the insect parts from drosophila
We have the worm parts from possibly schisto
We have motile actin from n. crassa
so, it is a process.
One with the earth.
WE are individually made. We are not bird, feather, butterfly, dicty, trypanasoma,
drosophila, or fungal.
DNA was in the archaea from other planets? That is what made up the earth
at the beginning. There were heat shock proteins, the ones now inside volcanoes.
Why did we ever need these in us from uracil?
Nirenberg
Now know uracil is being replaced by thymine.
and so on.
Until we get thorough dna testing, including, micro testing, and dimer testing, formed
from artificial strands that mimick actin in muscle, for example.
So, if you were to recreate a cell, where would you start? from LUCA
last universal common ancestor, was it a virus, a fungus filament, where
was the spark?
Woese was looking for something in the brackish waters, water between
fresh water and salt water, there would be the filament, I think,
recreating life from an evolutionary perspective.
Now, what is the spark, the same thing that makes lightening trypanasomatids
were found in cherts, fossilized. How did they become fossilized?
When archeological digs are kept under wraps, the truth is as well.
============================
Sorry , but I had to say this! I know freedom is not free.
=========================
Hox (Homeobox) Genes Evolution’s Saviour?
© 2000 Don Batten, Ph.D.. All Rights Reserved.
S ome evolutionists hailed homeobox or hox genes as the saviour of evolution soon after they were discovered. They seemed to fit into the Gouldian mode of evolution (punctuated equilibrium) because a small mutation in a hox gene could have profound effects on an organism. However, further research has not born out the evolutionists’ hopes. Dr Christian Schwabe, the non-creationist sceptic of Darwinian evolution from the Medical University of South Carolina (Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology), wrote:
‘Control genes like homeotic genes may be the target of mutations that would conceivably change phenotypes, but one must remember that, the more central one makes changes in a complex system, the more severe the peripheral consequences become. … Homeotic changes induced in Drosophila genes have led only to monstrosities, and most experimenters do not expect to see a bee arise from their Drosophila constructs.’ (Mini Review: Schwabe, C., 1994. Theoretical limitations of molecular phylogenetics and the evolution of relaxins. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 107B:167–177).
www.trueorigin.org/homeobox.aspskyship